Does Schwantz care for the citizen that his cops tryed to kill, is the kid still in a coma?

Has mayor Schwantz looked in, on the kid that one of his cops mauled down, last month?

I would like to know the results of the drug test, and what 3 party non governmental verification was done.

Officer Wenrich was so out of it, when he pulled me over, he didn't know the road he was on, color of the car he was following, or where he was, he was freeking out, higher than a kite, (court documented).

How about a drug test for every Palatine cop, every shift change, with 3 rd party verification.

I also, want to know the condition of this kid.

.Can't any one in the city hall of Palatine, take responsibility for any thing?.

Schwantz is now the mayor

We all know, I'm not a lawyer, some times I look up words, when I'm not sure of the meaning, why is the cop, not, being charged with

attempetd murder?

Wikipedia is great.

Murder, as defined in common law countries, is the unlawful killing of another human being withintent (or malice aforethought)

Specifically in the criminal law, malice aforethought (or malice prepense) is the element of mens rea(Latin for "guilty mind") which must accompany the actus reus of death, in order to secure a conviction for murder under the common law. In other words, knowledge that through an action or omission, the result will be some one's death.

Malice aforethought is a precisely defined legal term that does not correspond to the lay definitions of either of its constituent words. It means one of any of the following states of mind concurrent with an act or omission that resulted in death of a person. One textbook defines it as "a term of art if not a term of deception."^[1] The author further states that "murder does not require either spite or premeditation. Mercy killing can be murder, so can a killing where the intent is conceived on the instant." In English law themens rea requirement is an intention to cause death or to cause serious injury. Intention in this context is found either when the perpetrator acts with the purpose of causing death or serious injury, or, followingReg. v. Woollin [1999] 1 AC 82, where death or serious injury is a 'virtually certain' result of the perpetrator's act and the perpetrator has knowledge that death or serious injury is a virtually certain result.

To varying extents in the United States, the requisite intention can also be found where the perpetrator acts with gross recklessness showing lack of care for human life, commonly referred to as "depraved heart murder"

honesty - is asking to much from Palatine

I got pulled over by Wenrich, who was, high on drugs? intoxicated? hallucinating. Filed a false police report. All the additional arresting officers were high, on drugs, intoxicated also or just let a dirty brother slide. The entire village knew about this and has allowed this unprofessional criminal behavior to continue.

I was convicted on the sole creditability issue of this dirt bag cop. Wenrich, Police chief, fire brass, the mayor and her band of bandits and others have no problem with perjured documents or testimony. The appellate court also ruled on Wenrich's false report and perjured testimony as being highly creditable. A Illinois supreme justice, called, and we had a chat. Wenrich and pals made a fool out of a oath, honor, truth, the entire criminal justice system.

Then there is the crooked Baker, shaking down people he pulls over.

Palatine has a fair share of crooked people drawing a pay checks but there are some good men and women also.

YOU ever watching a village board meeting? a bunch of snakes!