any one look into Mayor Mullins with her part time job at "SALF"? Look pretty suspicious to me. She cannot have a job at another company (SALF) then use her elected job as Mayor, to praise, honor and employ (SALF). self glorification and I would think another conflict of interest, that puts money in her pocket, but, where is her income from (SALF)? I would bet it is hidden there some place.
http://palatine-mayor-rita-mullins.blogspot.com/
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s109-3533
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22norm+coleman%22+%22save+a+life+foundation%22+%22%2440+million%22&btnG=Search
http://usmayors.org/search/googlesearch.asp?cx=005847641447462338878%3Av_h-uyitptk&cof=FORID%3A11&q=%22save+a+life+foundation%22+mullins&sa.x=0&sa.y=0#699
http://speedcathollydale4.blogspot.com/2009/02/mayor-elizabeth-b-kautz-from-burnsville.html#comment-7225720206782763095
and
Mullins sues channel 7 along with a one man band blogger in Ohio and Heinrich. Criminals? I don't think so. Reporting or blogging about some things that they feel are important and true?
As far as I know, Mullins and her Village council, police department are dishonest, a disgrace, crooked, thief's and many belong in jail, and are involved in some serious stuff. I think they are way over their heads (you see, these guys commit crimes for so long it becomes easy, they keep getting away away with it. At some point they start to get sloppy, slip up and get caught. They were caught with the
Browns mess and all the good ole boys in the other governmental agencies again looked the other way, and let Palatine slide).
Now
What about the political future of Lisa Madigan (Illinois Attorney General), Anita Alvarez (Cook County States Attorney), and US attorney Fitzgerald and others? I emailed em a copy of the original email. To many people a political future is more important than a moral standard or law and order. Welcome to elected law enforcement to cover the backs of non elected law enforcement.
Show is in the pudding, any hint of breaking the law and a person is arrested. You (or I) can provide massive evidence of cops, judges and prosecutors breaking the law and nothing. The law at that point makes the authorities guilty of the same crimes and worse. How ever in reality, this is a non enforceable law, but pretends, on paper so show we have checks and balances. If laws had equal rights then there would be discrimination.
People don't mind pointing the finger, as long as it's not in their direction. Those with the bigger stick, make sure it's not pointed in their direction.
To me, it seems, they should do their job and prosecute crimes (without double standard) and (that means if done by one of their own (if necessary)), as they were elected to do, or do nothing and become an accessory, aiding and abetting to the cover up of a criminal conspiracy and or probably a dozen other violations. Doing nothing is like approval, acceptance of crimes, lawlessness, cover up.
I never asked cops high on drugs to pull me over, nor the massive cover up that followed.
Palatine cannot guarantee that a cop on patrol will be drug free or sober
Palatine cannot guarantee that a cop will not tamper with evidence
Palatine cannot guarantee that a cop will not fabricate evidence
Palatine cannot guarantee that all reports, documents will be truthful
Palatine cannot guarantee that they will not give perjured statements
But this is court approved
You would think at least a village could would supply a sober cop on duty I provided enough evidence for such and notified other authorities (not the state police, as far as I am concerned they are just as crooked, the only difference is the uniform........... there's got to be some less than crooked (you would think), just haven't meet any). From what I can see none of the people running for mayor are addressing honesty, accountability, fellowship, doing things for the citizens or merchants, nothing about the sobriety or making sure people leaving these bars will not get in trouble (most of the candidates had kick off parties at the local bars). Most are talking to hear them self's talk (you can google and get the latest verbiage).
The next mayor is stepping in this crap and going to get it all over em.
Why does Mullins allow people leave a bar that the city relocated on to city property less than sober? I think that Mullins is a enemy of the community, sick and twisted to let people leave that or any bar in a condition that is a risk to themselves and others, to allow their police force to be party animals, to encourage malfeasance, corruption that is rampet. I'm not saying arrest every one that leaves a bar, put provide safe transport to their destination or a waiting area until there is no longer a threat or something.
Mullins and city council allows and promotes intoxication on city property every day and encourages DUI's
This also is a numbers game, at some point in time, some one is going to leave this particular bar and on the way home, get in trouble (to say the least). I doubt if the city of Palatine will have enough money to cover damages.
These dumb elected officials, will wait for such a event to occur, be forced to take some type of preemptive measure that this wont happen again. This is another thing that just don't make sense.
What is this about Mullins suing her own village on a workman's comp claim, arising from a incident in Washington DC? I guess she wants more money? Is this another or the same law firm?
Mullins is using a municipal law firm, that does work for the city? (conflict of interest? - but this is the mighty Mullins from Palatine and her town that can do what they feel like, when and where, got a local law bar in town, has been given OK and a go ahead by Judges in the law bar to provide misleading fraudulent documents as facts, perjury, evidence tampering, witness tampering and what ever else, they want) (I got the case to prove it and it's the law). Maybe Mullins on her own or via, the Council of Mayors give this firm work in the form of extortion. Who's going to investigate, the mayors police departments?
Palatine has court approval and praise for bogus reports and testimony.
http://palatine-mayor-rita-mullins.blogspot.com/
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s109-3533
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22norm+coleman%22+%22save+a+life+foundation%22+%22%2440+million%22&btnG=Search
http://usmayors.org/search/googlesearch.asp?cx=005847641447462338878%3Av_h-uyitptk&cof=FORID%3A11&q=%22save+a+life+foundation%22+mullins&sa.x=0&sa.y=0#699
http://speedcathollydale4.blogspot.com/2009/02/mayor-elizabeth-b-kautz-from-burnsville.html#comment-7225720206782763095
and
Mullins sues channel 7 along with a one man band blogger in Ohio and Heinrich. Criminals? I don't think so. Reporting or blogging about some things that they feel are important and true?
As far as I know, Mullins and her Village council, police department are dishonest, a disgrace, crooked, thief's and many belong in jail, and are involved in some serious stuff. I think they are way over their heads (you see, these guys commit crimes for so long it becomes easy, they keep getting away away with it. At some point they start to get sloppy, slip up and get caught. They were caught with the
Browns mess and all the good ole boys in the other governmental agencies again looked the other way, and let Palatine slide).
Now
What about the political future of Lisa Madigan (Illinois Attorney General), Anita Alvarez (Cook County States Attorney), and US attorney Fitzgerald and others? I emailed em a copy of the original email. To many people a political future is more important than a moral standard or law and order. Welcome to elected law enforcement to cover the backs of non elected law enforcement.
Show is in the pudding, any hint of breaking the law and a person is arrested. You (or I) can provide massive evidence of cops, judges and prosecutors breaking the law and nothing. The law at that point makes the authorities guilty of the same crimes and worse. How ever in reality, this is a non enforceable law, but pretends, on paper so show we have checks and balances. If laws had equal rights then there would be discrimination.
People don't mind pointing the finger, as long as it's not in their direction. Those with the bigger stick, make sure it's not pointed in their direction.
To me, it seems, they should do their job and prosecute crimes (without double standard) and (that means if done by one of their own (if necessary)), as they were elected to do, or do nothing and become an accessory, aiding and abetting to the cover up of a criminal conspiracy and or probably a dozen other violations. Doing nothing is like approval, acceptance of crimes, lawlessness, cover up.
I never asked cops high on drugs to pull me over, nor the massive cover up that followed.
Palatine cannot guarantee that a cop on patrol will be drug free or sober
Palatine cannot guarantee that a cop will not tamper with evidence
Palatine cannot guarantee that a cop will not fabricate evidence
Palatine cannot guarantee that all reports, documents will be truthful
Palatine cannot guarantee that they will not give perjured statements
But this is court approved
You would think at least a village could would supply a sober cop on duty I provided enough evidence for such and notified other authorities (not the state police, as far as I am concerned they are just as crooked, the only difference is the uniform........... there's got to be some less than crooked (you would think), just haven't meet any). From what I can see none of the people running for mayor are addressing honesty, accountability, fellowship, doing things for the citizens or merchants, nothing about the sobriety or making sure people leaving these bars will not get in trouble (most of the candidates had kick off parties at the local bars). Most are talking to hear them self's talk (you can google and get the latest verbiage).
The next mayor is stepping in this crap and going to get it all over em.
Why does Mullins allow people leave a bar that the city relocated on to city property less than sober? I think that Mullins is a enemy of the community, sick and twisted to let people leave that or any bar in a condition that is a risk to themselves and others, to allow their police force to be party animals, to encourage malfeasance, corruption that is rampet. I'm not saying arrest every one that leaves a bar, put provide safe transport to their destination or a waiting area until there is no longer a threat or something.
Mullins and city council allows and promotes intoxication on city property every day and encourages DUI's
This also is a numbers game, at some point in time, some one is going to leave this particular bar and on the way home, get in trouble (to say the least). I doubt if the city of Palatine will have enough money to cover damages.
These dumb elected officials, will wait for such a event to occur, be forced to take some type of preemptive measure that this wont happen again. This is another thing that just don't make sense.
What is this about Mullins suing her own village on a workman's comp claim, arising from a incident in Washington DC? I guess she wants more money? Is this another or the same law firm?
Mullins is using a municipal law firm, that does work for the city? (conflict of interest? - but this is the mighty Mullins from Palatine and her town that can do what they feel like, when and where, got a local law bar in town, has been given OK and a go ahead by Judges in the law bar to provide misleading fraudulent documents as facts, perjury, evidence tampering, witness tampering and what ever else, they want) (I got the case to prove it and it's the law). Maybe Mullins on her own or via, the Council of Mayors give this firm work in the form of extortion. Who's going to investigate, the mayors police departments?
Palatine has court approval and praise for bogus reports and testimony.